Why should they? Such regulations are unconstitutional. There is no distinction in the 1st about owners and employees of commercial news agencies, only presses (ie persons who own mechanisms to distribute information to a community at large). On Fri, 9 Mar 2001, Declan McCullagh wrote:
David's comments in his response are on-target.
In this context, the only definition that seems to matter is what the DOJ believes to be a "member of the news media." In other words, if they say you're not, you likely would shoulder the burden to prove that you are.
Even if they acknowledge you are a journalist, the DOJ clearly does not feel bound to follow its own regulations.
____________________________________________________________________ Liberty means responsibility. That is why most men dread it. Locke The Armadillo Group ,::////;::-. James Choate Austin, Tx /:'///// ``::>/|/ ravage@ssz.com www.ssz.com .', |||| `/( e\ 512-451-7087 -====~~mm-'`-```-mm --'- --------------------------------------------------------------------