------- Blind-Carbon-Copy To: hungry@hungry.com Cc: chris@uidaho.edu, people@kuoi.sub.uidaho.edu Subject: $2500 for a class c. Date: Tue, 07 Jan 1997 15:19:25 PST Message-ID: <7130.852679165@bear.cs.uidaho.edu> From: faried nawaz <nawaz921@bear.cs.uidaho.edu> (two messages follow) From: gjohnson@dream.season.com (Reality is a point of view) Subject: IP allocation goes fee based soon?! Newsgroups: ba.internet Date: 6 Jan 1997 16:08:04 GMT Organization: season.com [205.179.33.0] Path: news.uidaho.edu!newsfeed.orst.edu!newshub.tc.umn.edu!spool.mu.edu!newspump.sol.net!howland.erols.net!agate!news.ucsc.edu!news.scruz.net!gjohnson Lines: 18 Message-ID: <slrn5d28r9.34.gjohnson@dream.season.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: 205.179.33.42 Xref: news.uidaho.edu ba.internet:12066 Take a look at http://rs.internic.net/arin for a quiet bombshell, especially Section 2.3. A Class C block for $2,500? If you think that isn't funny there are a few people that agree with you in threads elsewhere. Try a dejanews search on $2500 Class C. You might also want to take a peek at http://www.iahc.org for news about a commentary period that ends in the next few days. - -- Gary Johnson "Wahoo." gjohnson@season.com Remember why... later in the thread -- From: davidm@them.com (David Mandala) Subject: Re: IP allocation goes fee based soon?! Newsgroups: ba.internet Date: Tue, 07 Jan 97 19:10:07 GMT Organization: Them Productions Path: news.uidaho.edu!newsfeed.orst.edu!news.uoregon.edu!marlin.ucsf.edu!overload.lbl.gov!agate!spool.mu.edu!newspump.sol.net!howland.erols.net!news.bbnplanet.com!cam-news-hub1.bbnplanet.com!news-xfer.netaxs.com!news.texas.net!news1.best.com!nntp1.best.com!davidm Lines: 32 Message-ID: <5au72j$rnn@nntp1.best.com> References: <slrn5d28r9.34.gjohnson@dream.season.com> <e3mca8.3mx@oriole.sbay.org> <southernE3MJxJ.FKq@netcom.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: davidm.vip.best.com X-Newsreader: News Xpress 2.0 Beta #2 Xref: news.uidaho.edu ba.internet:12120 I've since heard that their contract run out in 1998, now since they have gone from a small nothing company to a widly known disaster, if follows that they are making money hand over fist. So before the contract opens we need to make enough noise with the goverment that the contract is NOT relet to them but rather to open bid, or to a true non profit alliance of Internet professionals to provide the service at cost (which in reality is quite small). Only we can make the difference. In article <southernE3MJxJ.FKq@netcom.com>, southern@netcom.com (Shawn) wrote:
In article <e3mca8.3mx@oriole.sbay.org>, George Bonser wrote: : Billions and Billions of IP addresses are right around the corner : and they are going to use the current shortage to set a precedent : (sp?) of charging $2500 per block of 256? That would put them in a : position to make an absolute KILLING when IPv6 comes out. ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Give that man a ceegar.
That is, I believe, the point.
All, of course, at $50/year per domain name.
With that kind of income, they might give Microsoft a run for their money as being one of the most profitable computer companies in the world. <tounge FIRMLY in cheek> :-)
Shawn
/************************************************************* David Mandala Them Productions San Francisco, CA Internet: davidm@them.com CIS: 74156,221 AOL: dism *************************************************************/ faried - -- i don't hate people. | my other car is a cdr why, some of my closest | linux, the ms-dos of the nineties friends are people. | <zorgo> cable and internet.. who needs a life? -- stevi@aa.net | http://www.hungry.com/~fn/ ------- End of Blind-Carbon-Copy