5 Sep
2001
5 Sep
'01
9:19 a.m.
On Wed, Sep 05, 2001 at 07:00:58AM -0500, measl@mfn.org wrote:
This is the case I had in mind when I made my recent assertion that thought==action in today's "court". How can anyone see this case, and not conclude otherwise? This dude is going to spend a long time in stir, for a *pure Thought Crime*.
What's new here? *Possession* of child porn has been illegal for at least a decade. Obscenity prosecutions for writing what people find objectionable have a long history: Joyce, Miller, etc. Take a longer view. -Declan