Declan McCullagh <declan@pathfinder.com> writes:
But Tim's conclusions are way off-target. Just because you have access to information doesn't mean you've been co-opted. For instance, contrary to what Tim says, I've never "promised to spin the story in a certain way."
You don't have to promise. You're very predictable. Given certain inputs you're very likely to write certain outputs.
I mean, geez, if nothing else, look at what I've been writing. Last Thursday I wrote about how the Federal government should get out of the business of "protecting privacy." On Friday I wrote about how "protecting children" from animated cartoon images is another pretext for Net-censorship. Who else is saying that?
Can a mailing list poster silence others by talking too much? --- Dr.Dimitri Vulis KOTM Brighton Beach Boardwalk BBS, Forest Hills, N.Y.: +1-718-261-2013, 14.4Kbps