These are likely due to disks filling up at ssz (due to SirCam). Thanks, -Brian On Thu, 26 Jul 2001, Reese wrote:
No, but I received a couple of these:
From: CDR Hub Account <cpunks@einstein.ssz.com> Message-Id: <200107261318.IAA01203@einstein.ssz.com> Approved: LISTMEMBER CPUNK Sender: owner-cypherpunks@lne.com Precedence: bulk X-Loop: cypherpunks@lne.com
With a completely blank message body.
Once again, with full headers:
Return-Path: <owner-cypherpunks@lne.com> Received: from slack.lne.com (dns.lne.com [209.157.136.81]) by flex.com (8.11.0/8.11.0) with ESMTP id f6QDJKC04445 for <reeza@flex.com>; Thu, 26 Jul 2001 03:19:20 -1000 (HST) Received: (from majordom@localhost) by slack.lne.com (8.11.0/8.11.0) id f6QDDGc31813 for cypherpunks-goingout; Thu, 26 Jul 2001 06:13:16 -0700 X-Authentication-Warning: slack.lne.com: majordom set sender to owner-cypherpunks@lne.com using -f Received: (from cpunk@localhost) by slack.lne.com (8.11.0/8.11.0) id f6QDDFu31791 for cypherpunks@lne.com; Thu, 26 Jul 2001 06:13:15 -0700 Received: from hq.pro-ns.net (hq.pro-ns.net [208.200.182.20]) by slack.lne.com (8.11.0/8.11.0) with ESMTP id f6QDDEx31781 for <cpunk@lne.com>; Thu, 26 Jul 2001 06:13:14 -0700 Received: (from cpunks@localhost) by hq.pro-ns.net (8.11.3/8.11.1) id f6QDDJR83218 for cpunk@lne.com; Thu, 26 Jul 2001 08:13:19 -0500 (CDT) Received: from einstein.ssz.com (einstein.ssz.com [204.96.2.99]) by hq.pro-ns.net (8.11.3/8.11.1) with ESMTP id f6QDCh182868 for <cypherpunks@ds.pro-ns.net>; Thu, 26 Jul 2001 08:12:44 -0500 (CDT) Received: (from cpunks@localhost) by einstein.ssz.com (8.8.8/8.8.8) id IAA01203 for cypherpunks@ds.pro-ns.net; Thu, 26 Jul 2001 08:18:58 -0500 Date: Thu, 26 Jul 2001 08:18:58 -0500 From: CDR Hub Account <cpunks@einstein.ssz.com> Message-Id: <200107261318.IAA01203@einstein.ssz.com> Approved: LISTMEMBER CPUNK Sender: owner-cypherpunks@lne.com Precedence: bulk X-Loop: cypherpunks@lne.com X-UIDL: Fh[!!"R*"!;),!!F0~"!
Eric, is this also because of the Sircam junque?
Reese