Thus spake cypherpunk (cyphrpunk@gmail.com) [28/04/05 18:48]: : A remailer posted about EncFS. Gerow quoted the first paragraph and : added the criticism that it doesn't do locking. Dixon saw the quoted : first paragraph, which said that the link to the program was "below". : And indeed, it was below, in the first message from the remailer. It : included this link, http://arg0.net/users/vgough/encfs.html. But Dixon : apparently didn't understand the notion of quoting partial messages in : a mailing list conversation. He just saw the part about the link being : "below", and in Gerow's message there was no such link. So he : complained: there was nothing "below". But Gerow misunderstood, he : though Dixon was commenting about EncFS's locking mechanisms. So Gerow : responded as below, adding to the confusion. In my defense, I assumed a baseline of understanding when it comes to public lists. The last thing I expected was him to quote /me/ and complain about something that someone /else/ had said, when it was all painfully obvious from the first message. I guess I just won't assume that around here anymore. : Honestly, I don't know how you people generate enough brain power to : keep yourselves alive. Breathing comes automatically. No thought required.