Re: Microsoft Trial Judge Based His Break-Up "Remedy" On Flawed Theory, Not Facts

lizard wrote:

But if source code is free speech, isn't a judge ordering some code be removed/edited/changed an intrustion on free speech? Isn't saying "Remove Explorer from the core install!" the same as saying "Remove this chapter from this book!"

Is a judge ordering people to stop making illegal copies of M$ software and sharing it with their friends not also an "intrusion into free speech"? I agree that mandating the relationship between IE and Windows is stupid, mind you - it's an ad hoc after the event remedy, where much more fundamental ones are called for. Danny.