Jimbo backpedaled:
I doubt seriously anyone would be blinded...
Self-defense is justified on the reasonable fear of great bodily harm. Whether you in your lawyer wannabe mind set "doubt" it or not is irrelevant. Care to risk your other eye in an experiment? Even though you might "doubt" you would be blinded, I doubt you would run the risk. Neither would someone in a car were you threatening them with a fire extinguisher.
yes it's great bodily injury. It's not justification for lethal force.
As usual, you are wrong again. Under the laws of most--if not all--US jurisdictions, it is. If you don't think so, fine, just sit there like a jerk with you gun in your hand and let the nice rioter have a go at your car window.
...I've seen windows break (and broken my fair share) on cars multiple times. Some from wrecks, some from gunshot...I even once had a D based rocket fired directly into the windshield of a 68 Cougar...I'm blind in one eye from being struck with a 2x4...
Wrecks, gunshots, rocket attacks and 2x4s, huh? Wake up Jimbo; can't you see that the universe is trying to tell you something? That ringing sound you keep ignoring is the clue-phone, Jimbo. S a n d y