Isn't what is new here is that the man did not publish this material as was the material of Joyce, Miller, et al? Nobody saw it except him and the cop who discovered it. It was the Man who published, converted private scribblings into illegal material, not the man. Neat trick, the drooling officials building private collections, like the story today of the Soviets amassing a huge stock of erotica, now and then visited by officials who, the porno librarian claims, always expressed shock and outrage, then purloined a few samples for private use. "What could I do about the stealing," the librarian is quoted, "they were officials." If officials possess gobs of kiddie porn, as many confessedly brag, and claim to be shocked, shocked, and eagerly exhibit the stuff to judges and juries and court attendants who are shocked, shocked, what is wrong with that? Thank Buddha the FBI is working closely with the Red Chinese, reported in the WSJ yesterday, in US-Chineses criminal investigations to balance the US promoting anonymizers to bypass Chinese clampdown on the Internet. What is Carnivore called in the PRC? There will be no peepholes in anonymizers trusted by the citizen users. A bit of loose code, hardly noticeable, but thankfully no moral code, why that would be consumer/ customer/voter/dissident/reputation/gosh my editor, my boss did it, I couldn't have known, I'm only human, the pressure was incredible/here are my private scribblings trust me betrayal.