At 2:59 PM -0700 10/1/97, Jim Choate wrote:
From: Bill Frantz <frantz@netcom.com> At 7:49 PM -0700 9/30/97, Jim Choate wrote:
My original question still stands, why would I or any other party choose to use an anonymous remailer for anything other than the original 3 items I mentioned previously.
I have heard of people's posts being brought up in employment interviews. A rational person might want to express controversial opinions anonymously.
And your point is? My personal opinions have nothing to do with my professional career and yours shouldn't either. I would love to have a company bring up my past posts, makes it easy to decide if I want to work there or not.
If you want to work for such a company and you know their views and your views are in conflict then I would say you need a shrink not an anon. remailer.
You see my stand in the .sig below. (Hint, it is my "true name".) However, I am willing to admit that others may see it differently and want to use remailers. ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Bill Frantz | Internal surveillance | Periwinkle -- Consulting (408)356-8506 | helped make the USSR the | 16345 Englewood Ave. frantz@netcom.com | nation it is today. | Los Gatos, CA 95032, USA