On Sun, 27 Feb 1994, Johan Helsingius wrote:
Yes, not to mention that it just seems a lot cleaner so to speack, and also I dont have IRC here.
But you don't have a MOO client either!
yeah, i don't
I think a virtual MOO is very important at this juncture. It's probably the best low-cost(as in close to nil) virtual meeting you can get.
Uh... Why is IRC any more expensive?
Well considering that in IRC you dont have all the neat stuff you can do in a MOO, like some people explained with the rows and "speaking sticks" ideas. IRC is very cheap, free, but it is also rather minimal in my opinion.
Just as long as I can get a client(not a prob) and am sufficiently prepared to figure out wht MOO it's on etc.. so I can go get accustumed. etc...
You are prepared to get a MOO client but not an IRC client?
Well, yes, it's alot easier to get the MOO client, then it would be to get the IRC client and compile it on a low quota account wiht sysops that dont like IRC at all. I have tried it before with limited succes, and I dont plan on doing it again considering the status that the sysops have put it under here. My point simply was that MOOs IMO lend themselves to more of a virtual reality feel, than IRC does. I have been on IRC and to follow multiple threads on it, and to have a meaninglful structure to the discussion, is very difficult IMO.
Julf
You're eqipped with a hundred billion nueron brain, that's wired and fired, and it's a reality generating device, but you've got too do it. Free youself ----Tim Leary----