Jim Choate wrote:
I didn't say they are veiled because they value privacy, did I? nope, I didn't. stop reading into my words and start reading the words themselves. thank you.
I didn't say you did. I DID say your statement was misleading because it only mentions privacy. That isn't the only issue with your example. As a result, it's a weak argument.
As usual, you pick an example, it has a couple of nit picks you skipped or thought unimportant, and you get all defensive when they're pointed out. Almost like you're still searching for Mr. Goodbar still...
Pick your examples more carefully and explain them a bit more carefully and you won't have this problem.
eh, where exactly is your problem? frankly, I don't care if people without brains could get "mislead" or something I said has a hair in it that you can split. maybe I should add a disclaimer to my mails: "some intelligence required. parts not included"