-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- On Tue, 14 Jan 1997 paul@fatmans.demon.co.uk wrote:
Am I to presume that we will be putting something in the "welcome to cypherpunks" message people get when they join to tell them how to subscribe to the uncensored list?
- From the "welcome message": I. Administrivia (please read, boring though it may be) The cypherpunks list is one of three lists discussing cryptography, privacy, and social issues relating to them. The three lists are: cypherpunks moderated to suppress spam and flames cypherpunks-unedited all submissions, just as they arrived cypherpunks-flames the submissions that didn't pass moderation All of these lists are high-volume mailing lists.
or are we going to have yet more censorship on this list which is rapidly degenerating into a playground of illuminati and elite censors???
This list is rapidly degenerating into something, but it's not "a playground of illuminati and elite censors". Mark -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: 2.6.3 Charset: noconv iQEVAwUBMtw32CzIPc7jvyFpAQFU0wf9H77cGP3nfVfogGqy3r+PHxOVVmpivLbK 0d8b/5ay7H6KGpvivXdV+YwqVLu75hLm59H7zPZBb0387R8T/cISg3AznP5F1upP IJDA36ebKWIIHOcLMOkwAIkQq8yI/xWCtvp4DInoC2VL4HbzFcjQbLaO6+up3KDK mNLslx6vWFtNGzGbxvOrMvyfm/2UJseYLnvkm0YOWmpdLqJiakEh1FED2UbWhHig KpJq1XLyjaT7ahEscN2oo6iWglOWikXRatFHGipqCgpNLqjA8uSaHifvO/dtAP09 Xy1z+hax0lnEiid0izqaCFpcr1jhEB89Ylk/iYgBAeZB+3UzvZVXow== =kJwv -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----