On Fri, 30 Mar 2001, Greg Newby wrote:
The theory of a "movement" is part of the FUD surrounding Bell. It's not that HE's assassinating people, but that his "followers" might.
blink blink. Bell? "followers?" While I'm willing to be polite to most people on mailing lists, and occasionally find interest in the things (especially the things contrary to established rules of "sanity") that they say, I cannot *imagine* anyone actually becoming a "follower" of a person such as Jim Bell. Even setting aside for a few moments the inherent goofiness of AP (which they seem to be implying that this is about) Bell simply doesn't exhibit any leadership characteristics. At least not in anything I've read. His writings give me the impression of a man too antisocial to remain on good terms with any would-be "followers." Bear