In the US it not illegal to posess TEMPEST-surveillance equipment but it is illegal to take appropriate counter-measures to prevent surveillance. The US government has refused to release details of its
Please provide a reference for this. We've discussed this _many_ times on this List, and the consensus is that no such law exists, nor is it plausible that folks could be told they cannot "shield" their computers. (In fact, FCC regulations call for various levels of RF shielding, as we all know. Is there a law which says "You must shield--but not _too_ much"? Of course not.) I don't want to sound rude, but saying it is illegal to take appropriate counter-measures to prevent surveillance is a serious statement, requiring some support. (I'll look for the ftp paper you cite later...do you have a pathname handy in the nist ftp site?) I can believe that _certain_ countermeasures, like active jamming with RF signals, may be somewhat restricted, but mainly for FCC reasons. I cannot believe that shielding a keyboard or computer, or using LCD displays to reduce Van Eck emissions, or even putting one's computer in a Faraday cage, could be illegal.
TEMPEST research and has restricted the dissemination of independent research by classifying it.
Parts of the TEMPEST spec (and TEMPEST is not an acronym for anything, I understand) are classified, for various reasons, but this does not mean shielding or other countermeasures are forbidden. In fact, shielding supplies and TEMPEST-related supplies can be bought from several companies. Every time this thread comes up, someone cites the suppliers.
The US Drug Enforcement Agency (DEA) makes use of TEMPEST secured electronics and computers as they believe that the drug cartels may possess surveillance equipment.
I'll phone Pablo Escobar and ask him.
I am interested in gathering comments on the social, legal, ethical, and technical aspects of use of TEMPEST surveillance equipment in the US and Europe with the aim of including it in a discussion of the threats to computer/digital systems.
thanks, - Rob Jackson
(more information on TEMPEST can be found in the paper "Eavesdropping On the Electromagnetic Emanations of Digital Equipment: The Laws of Canada, England, and the US" by Cristopher Seline - available on FTP from csrc.ncsl.nist.gov)
Lots of interesting stuff there. But where is the paper you cite? A pathname would be appreciated. --Tim May -- .......................................................................... Timothy C. May | Crypto Anarchy: encryption, digital money, tcmay@netcom.com | anonymous networks, digital pseudonyms, zero 408-688-5409 | knowledge, reputations, information markets, W.A.S.T.E.: Aptos, CA | black markets, collapse of governments. Higher Power:2**859433 | Public Key: PGP and MailSafe available.