On Sun, 12 Jan 1997, Igor Chudov @ home wrote:
Nurdane Oksas wrote:
On Sat, 11 Jan 1997, Igor Chudov @ home wrote:
Dr.Dimitri Vulis KOTM wrote:
Jew-hating paranoid liar Rich Graves <rcgraves@disposable.com> writes:
I would not favor a moderation policy that gave carte blanche to "good guys" to talk about whatever they wanted ("libertarian bullshit" in Chudov's delicate phrasing), but required posts by "bad guys" like Dale (and in certai threads, me -- you never know) to be "about crypto." That's a hypocritical double standard.
Here's another typical post from Igor's soc.culture.russian.moderated (NOT).
Igor Chudov, a moderator of s.c.r.m, calls M. Kagalenko "envious eunich", but Kagalenko has been banned from posting to s.c.r.m because he objected to its creation (i.e. he's on the "blacklist" and his submissions are auto-rejected).
but none of the posts in question had ever been posted to scrm.
You know well that Kagalenko is most rejected in scrm, Poor guy ...not one post, how can that be..?
How can that be? A good question. It can be because Misha submits dozens of articles containing autogenerated garbage. He does it because he does not like our newsgroup. We moderators have no other choice but to reject these autogenerated articles because our charter prohibits us from approving them.
Sure.
To protect moderators from mailbombing our charter tells us to put such mailbombers into our blacklist, which I do.
OK.
Once a month I remove Misha from our blacklist, and let him know that he indeed had been removed. That usually results in another flood of bogus submissions.
Well, i trust your judgment, not sure of other moderators. [...]
Apparently Misha likes it this way, and it probably lets him feel more important than he really is. Well, if that is so, I have no problem with that.
But I will not bow to him.
:)
That's the sad story.
Thank you .