On Sat, 16 Dec 2000, Me wrote:
----- Original Message ----- From: "Jim Choate" <ravage@ssz.com>
Crypto-anarchy and libertarianism are just another form of fascism at best and socialism at worst. It's a means for one group of people to oppress and control another.
If Choatean programming follows Choatean physics and political philosophy, a lot of IBM's design choices suddenly make sense.
I look forward to your defence of crypto-anarchy-libertarian ideals. Is your premise that anarchy doesn't lead to a 'socialist' society? A society in which the choices of the individual are made en masse? Consider the congruency of world view a working anarchy requires? Then consider the disparity of world views between any two people. How do you resolve this obvious conflict? Anarchy has no answer other than everyone will do the 'right' thing because there isn't a 'government' there to coerce them by force. Anarchy can't even tell you what a 'government' is. Read the FAQ that is widely available on the web. Let's get rid of 'government' is nothing more than a veil for getting rid of people who differ in point of view. What is government? It's people who share some commen world view and agree, to a wide variety of degree, at least in some minimalist way on how it should be implimented. To get rid of government is to a priori restrict this world view. Yet anarchy promises us a wider choice of world view, apparently only so long as it's the approved one. How does a working anarchy resolve real world disputes? I offer you the example of a tree which is rooted in my back yard but has limbs impinging on my neighbors roof. Is it his or my responsibility to cut the limbs back to deter damage? Why? Whose responsiblity to pay for any damage that does occur to the roof from limbs? Why? When the tree dies who is responsible for the bill to remove the dead husk? Why? What happens if at any point during this resolution phase one of the parties refuses to participate further? Who do they go to for arbitration? What standards of arbitration will be used? Who is responsible for assuring compliance? What are the limits of compliance enforcement? Now, let's assume we've a neighbor making bombs and his garage is 15 ft. from your childs bedroom? Let's ask the same sorts of questions? As we've discussed before on the list, in the cases of commen services like fire fighting which are converted to profit making enterprises, how is intentional fire starting to be prevented? Who is to review the evidence and pursue the parties involved? How are they to be held accountable? ____________________________________________________________________ Before a larger group can see the virtue of an idea, a smaller group must first understand it. "Stranger Suns" George Zebrowski The Armadillo Group ,::////;::-. James Choate Austin, Tx /:'///// ``::>/|/ ravage@ssz.com www.ssz.com .', |||| `/( e\ 512-451-7087 -====~~mm-'`-```-mm --'- --------------------------------------------------------------------