On Thu, 7 Nov 1996, Greg Broiles wrote:
So my impression is that you've got the tail end of a useful concept (ability to control is frequently a factor used to determine liability) but are making far too much out of it. One really big difference I see here is that editorial control of the Cpunks list has occurred once (in 4? 5? years of the list's existence), is on a per-person not a per-message basis, and *does not function to restrict who can send messages but only limits Vulis' ability to _receive_ them on his usual system(s)*.
I usually dislike "me too" messages, but in the case of legal discussion, I think they can be useful. Having said that: I concur. -- Forward complaints to : European Association of Envelope Manufactures Finger for Public Key Gutenbergstrasse 21;Postfach;CH-3001;Bern Vote Monarchist Switzerland