Everyone,
Just a quick observation here. According to the Wired chart, it appears that the Republicans average roughly 49.85058296 and the Democrats average roughly 47.27853081 on the Wired News scale, with one representative being independent (Bernard Sanders), and one representative with an "A" for their party designation (Spencer Bachus). Here's my Republicans vs. Democrats breakdown of the Wired News chart:
Party | Republican | Democrat |
-----------------------------------
HR2301 | 0.181818182 | 0.343137255 |
-----------------------------------
HR3615 | 0.153846154 | 0.024509804 |
-----------------------------------
HR3709 | 0.958715596 | 0.697115385 |
-----------------------------------
HR3125 | 0.218009479 | 0.575129534 |
-----------------------------------
HR1501 | 0.440909091 | 0.908653846 |
-----------------------------------
HR10 | 0.522522523 | 0.058252427 |
-----------------------------------
HR1714 | 0.986175115 | 0.695652174 |
-----------------------------------
total | 3.381165919 | 3.203791469 |
-----------------------------------
votes | 6.798206278 | 6.777251185 |
-----------------------------------
score | 49.85058296 | 47.27853081 |
-----------------------------------
These are all just averages, and I omitted the "A" and "I" designated representatives. In regards to the "A" designated representative, Spencer Bachus, I think the "A" is an error. I was under the impression that he was a Republican. If he is, in fact, a Republican, then that changes our averages slightly:
Party | Republican | Democrat |
-----------------------------------
HR2301 | 0.180995475 | 0.343137255 |
-----------------------------------
HR3615 | 0.153110048 | 0.024509804 |
-----------------------------------
HR3709 | 0.95890411 | 0.697115385 |
-----------------------------------
HR3125 | 0.216981132 | 0.575129534 |
-----------------------------------
HR1501 | 0.438914027 | 0.908653846 |
-----------------------------------
HR10 | 0.520179372 | 0.058252427 |
-----------------------------------
HR1714 | 0.986238532 | 0.695652174 |
-----------------------------------
total | 3.375 | 3.203791469 |
-----------------------------------
votes | 6.799107143 | 6.777251185 |
-----------------------------------
score | 49.75558036 | 47.27853081 |
-----------------------------------
Which still puts Republicans in more of a hands-off strategy for technology, according to voting history. If Spencer Bachus is not a Republican, then please tell me what the hell an "A" party designation stands for.
If you are interested in seeing TOTALS as opposed to AVERAGES, here is your chart:
Party | Republican | Democrat |
-----------------------------------
HR2301 | 40 | 70 |
-----------------------------------
HR3615 | 32 | 5 |
-----------------------------------
HR3709 | 210 | 145 |
-----------------------------------
HR3125 | 46 | 111 |
-----------------------------------
HR1501 | 97 | 189 |
-----------------------------------
HR10 | 116 | 12 |
-----------------------------------
HR1714 | 215 | 144 |
-----------------------------------
total | 756 | 676 |
-----------------------------------
votes | 1523 | 1430 |
-----------------------------------
Again, it is entirely possible that my information is incorrect. I do recommend that you do the research yourself, as relying too much on these numbers means relying on numbers collected by a media source and in turn sorted and re-calculated by some punk-ass on the cypherpunks mailing list.
To the best of my knowledge, however, this looks right. What alarms me is that though there is a slight difference in the overall score between Republicans and Democrats, neither party has a very strong leaning one way or the other, which illustrates the frustrations that a two-party system creates for those of us who would like to see a strong stance (either way) on the issue of government regulation of technology. I anxiously await any speculation that might take place on this list regarding how Libertarian representatives might have voted had they been in there, but the fact is that we live in a two-party system for the time being, and if we feel strongly about these issues, we need to accept that our representation may not be hearing us. Is it because we aren't speaking loudly enough on these issues?
ok,
Rush Carskadden
-----Original Message-----
From: Declan McCullagh [mailto:declan@well.com]
Sent: Tuesday, October 24, 2000 11:15 AM
To: Cypherpunks Mailing List
Cc: fight-censorship@vorlon.mit.edu
Subject: Wired News tech scorecard for U.S. House of Representatives
At Wired News, we've compiled a list of the technology voting records of
each member of the U.S. House of Representatives.
That meant picking seven tech bills and grading all 435 legislators -- at
least the ones who showed up those days -- on their floor votes. If they
chose to take a hands-off approach, they got a "1", while regulatory votes
got a "0." (If you disagree with us, flip the scale around.)
Here's the list sorted by last name (scoll down to find your legislator):
http://www.wired.com/news/print/0,1294,39637,00.html
Sorted by score, with the two California reps with 100 percent at the top:
http://www.wired.com/news/print/0,1294,39636,00.html
And a summary of the results, with some methodology:
http://www.wired.com/news/politics/0,1283,39625,00.html
Some interesting results: Purported privacy advocates like Democrat Ed
Markey didn't score well, getting a 33% of 100%, in part because of his
opposition to financial privacy legislation. Republican Bob Goodlatte,
Internet caucus co-chair, got just 43% because of his support for speech
and gambling restrictions.
-Declan
The floor votes scored:
HR2031: A vote to restrict online sales of alcohol. (No is 1)
HR3615: A vote to create a new federal agency to spend $1.25 billion on
rural TV service. (No is 1)
HR3709: A vote to extend a temporary federal ban on Internet taxes. (Yes is 1)
HR3125: A vote to prohibit Internet gambling. (No is 1)
HR1501: A vote on an amendment to restrict the sale of violent material
such as videogames to anyone under the age of 18. (No is 1)
HR10: A vote on an amendment to protect financial privacy by restricting
government monitoring of bank accounts. (Yes is 1)
HR1714: A vote to allow the use of electronic signatures. (Yes is 1)