On Thu, 23 Aug 2001, David Honig wrote:
Just because you're German doesn't mean you can say 'tight glands' without a snicker. 'Highly conductive gaskets' is perhaps less likely
Um, how do you know I wrote it without a snicker? ;) Actually, I was referring to cable ducts which can act as a waveguide. Of course, a fiber is rather thin, and it can be wrapped with adhesive copper strips, so that it wouldn't be just a hole.
to amuse the more adolescent among us.
Testing is key. If you don't measure, you don't know.
Renting time in HF testing facilities is expensive. Do you have suggestions for a simple sniffer type of instrument, that detects the amplitude of a radiated field? Do FETs pick up HF fine? I intend to build me a wearable based on a LART type of board http://www.lart.tudelft.nl/ which will also house the crypto setup. Tempest proofing the rig will be definitely part of the considerations. I see most problems with the twiddler and the hud. -- Eugen* Leitl <a href="http://www.lrz.de/~ui22204/">leitl</a> ______________________________________________________________ ICBMTO : N48 10'07'' E011 33'53'' http://www.lrz.de/~ui22204 57F9CFD3: ED90 0433 EB74 E4A9 537F CFF5 86E7 629B 57F9 CFD3