If this is the case she needs to be _much_ more careful about what she says in `personal' interviews.
<sigh>
There seems to be a point being missed in this thread. :(
This was not a 'personal' interview. The paper was not interested in Ms. Dyson's views on anonymity on the internet because she seemed like a nice person. The only reason she was interviewed is because of her position with the EFF as chairwoman.
Rather unlikely, actually. Dyson is far better known, everywhere but the Internet early-adopter crowd, as publisher of Release 1.0 and an industry analyst. Same goes for a lot of our other boardmembers. Who many people outside of the civ-lib crowd know Jane Metcalfe from EFF, vs. from Wired? Even Mitch Kapor is better know as founder of Lotus than of EFF. A lot of press coverage she gets never even mentions EFF at all! Barlow's probalby the only exception - retired ranchers and songwriters who aren't also singers generally don't attract many reporters. -- <HTML><A HREF="http://www.eff.org/~mech/"> Stanton McCandlish </A><HR><A HREF="mailto:mech@eff.org"> mech@eff.org </A><P><A HREF="http://www.eff.org/"> Electronic Frontier Foundation </A><P> Online Activist </HTML>