"A. Melon" wrote:
Michigans Anti-Cussing Law Called Into Question
<<A Michigan boor swore at and made sexually suggestive gestures to a woman after she asked him not to swear near a small child. He might be charged under MI's anti-swearing law or under disturbing the peace.>>
This doesn't sound like the peace and safety of the community is being threatened. Why doesn't the offended woman file a civil claim, if she was that offended? I don't know Michigan law, but the offence should fit within the common law "intentional infliction of mental distress" and "nuisance" torts.
(I can't believe I wrote that. Two weeks in law school and I'm already warped.)
Down, not across. -- A quote from Petro's Archives: ********************************************** Sometimes it is said that man can not be trusted with the government of himself. Can he, then, be trusted with the government of others? Or have we found angels in the forms of kings to govern him? Let history answer this question. -- Thomas Jefferson, 1st Inaugural