On Tue, 10 Jan 1995, Avi Harris Baumstein wrote:
dfloyd@io.com writes:
My problem is not that people will bitch about my DH. My problem will be arfholes or yellow journalists uploading K*dd*e p**n to my DH, then making a long report how I cater to p*dofiles and other evil denezins that pop from time to time. Then, I get the police knocking at my door, asking me to come to Club Fed for a looooonnnggg vacation.
well i remember a suggestion a while back to only accept encrypted files. i don't remember who made the suggestion, but this seems like a good idea for several reasons:
I like this too, it keeps the data safe not only in transit, but also on the site itself. So I don't have to re-encrypt files, they are alredy crypted, and signed(another good bonus) by the sender or account holder.
2) you will have no idea *what* is stored, and absolutely no way of finding out, even if you wanted to. you should advertise this feature widely.
depends on how it is encrypted, if they encrypt it too the datahaven, using your public key, that argument won't work, BUT if they are suing it as a anon drop box, then they can encypt it to another publik key of the recipient(an anon key of course) and oyu would never be abl to read it. This is a good feature of a data-haven, one that may be able to produce profit int eh future if tha is a motive.