-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Uh, how come we can't stick to attacking the message, rather than the messenger?
Because in this case, the messenger is an integral part of the message.
I disagree. How do you react when you see an attack ad on TV. Does it really want to make you vote for the sponsor? Or does it make you wish they'd BOTH crawl off and die somewhere? After watching just a little of the Huffington vs Feinstein Senate campaign here in CA, I know how *I* feel.
We definitely have the upper hand on this issue. Dorothy Denning may be a naive pawn of the government. She may hold beliefs that appall the rest of us. She may have lost whatever credibility she had in the crypto community by her position. But I still prefer to attack that position and the (il)logic behind it rather than to resort to attacking the person expressing it. Especially when the argument itself is almost a no-brainer.
I think the reason people attack the messenger is because people in the government listen to her, and I for one am exasperated beyond words to know that my government is paying attention to such an idiotic scheme, and (BTW) violating every known law of security to do so. Denning, in a very real sense, represents the attitudes of the NSA and the people controlling this whole scheme and trying to foist it off onto people. Is she such an idiot that she actually *believes* the nonsense she spouts? Is it wrong to suspect her motives, her judgement, her common sense, in backing such a proposal? - -- Ed Carp, N7EKG Ed.Carp@linux.org, ecarp@netcom.com Finger ecarp@netcom.com for PGP 2.5 public key an88744@anon.penet.fi If you want magic, let go of your armor. Magic is so much stronger than steel! -- Richard Bach, "The Bridge Across Forever" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: 2.6 iQCVAwUBLpOfpiS9AwzY9LDxAQExvwP9GXQ107W3o1XzbSv/7oV9/OJ8iJbUmYL5 ckB5y2NJ//NaFbEGF2P/muf+VN8ypIhniRqm267mEQIJVLqP5C6SIS11JZJnglsS zjLlIEJuv+xmG6BYJyHVbC8ShIweYPtLlkGg5KQSmYmN/MjDpBJ3wDoLARM1xUoL 1MPxVn0W8jU= =j5xg -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----