-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Roy M. Silvernail wrote: | In list.cypherpunks, ipgsales@cyberstation.net writes: | Since a copy of the IPG system has apparently arrived unsolicited in my | mailbox this morning ("apparently" because I haven't unpacked or | inspected the MIME message; "unsolicited" because I did not request it), | I believe it's disclaimer time. | | I have entered into no agreements to inspect, test or validate the IPG | software suite. In the absence of a valid contract for my services, I | shall not inspect, test or offer opinions regarding the security of this | product. IPG Sales is specificly enjoined from using my nym in any | reference to validation of their product. Further, IPG is cautioned | against using "cypherpunks" as a validation reference, as my | subscription to this mailing list could then be construed as | contributing to the claim of validation. This action is intended to | guard against claims of the form "roy@sendai.cybrspc.mn.org has been | unable to break our system", among others. | | Note to IPG: I review all contract offers. Feel free to contact me for | terms, but be advised that I'm somewhat expensive. | | Note to c'punks: apologies for burning listwidth, but this looks like | the proper Publication of Record for this notice. I'd like to add my name to Roy's letter. I also received an unsoliceted (1700 line) copy of an algorithim. I do intend to review it. I strongly caution IPG against using my name in their advertising. Adam - -- "It is seldom that liberty of any kind is lost all at once." -Hume -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: 2.6.2 iQCSAwUBMU7R6N5XP6PQNGpRAQEp+APlHLT35qjhK5buecy5srQg3kQFJ8vce1QR 25GDw5rqK21nT5g8QWKTq0gcWk9EFyFPqKzC8kfPn2BOQ/u7RI3kRHTCGvlOzy0C X0fqqKgwXVeuYfShZGUmfz6Xeuiia208KJ6ZBkQkaK6o7J9ZKyZEoDob9k75B1ww HBmVJxc= =lg/D -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----