-=|[ duuh... ]|=- "NONSTOP" is moreso a protocol and general criteria for operations. It is not soley restricted to physical, TEMPEST, hij/abduct, intel, crypto, or any other specific protection mechanism. NONSTOP is more a general idea and concept, with implications and implementations across all interrelated elements which probibly 'shouldn't stop'... JYA has an email from me directly with more basic info/'theory'. (he will review and use whatever content desired thereof) You note NONSTOP"" with hijack type associated logic... Although these phrases refer to some unknown ic/dod/etc protocols, it is also quite well founded in reality... NONSTOP protections prevent hijack. End of point. How? Research this. A previous cp CDR message about a year ago referenced HIJACK/NONSTOP training at the afb in san-antonio TX... It had TEMPEST shielding protocol as a parallel course to NONSTOP... Any logical speculation as to why? -- With 'baaah' in mind, -Wilfred Wilfred@Cryogen.com -=|[.]|=- At 10:54 PM 1/12/2001 -0500, you wrote:
At 10:56 PM 1/12/01 -0500, Declan McCullagh wrote:
David's suggestion makes sense to me. But if NONSTOP is a codeword, it would be classified at least secret, and manufacturers of such products would be discouraged by their customers at NSA from labeling their products with such a name.
-Declan