![](https://secure.gravatar.com/avatar/dac2c7234cb5c7a58be01eeb2c8fda77.jpg?s=120&d=mm&r=g)
17 Dec
2003
17 Dec
'03
11:17 p.m.
? the Platypus {aka David Formosa} <dformosa@st.nepean.uws.edu.au> writes:
So if the remailers don't support From: pasting, it's no loss. Similarly, for Reply-To: and Sender: and Path: and Received: and maybe a few other occasionally-forged header fields.
There is a good reson to allow peaple to stick there a 'Reply-To:' in. This permits replies to be directed to some sort of anon post office box or other such mechanisum.
Just a thought: suppose "reply-to" points to a nym listed on a key server and the entire article is signed with a key for that nym? --- Dr.Dimitri Vulis KOTM Brighton Beach Boardwalk BBS, Forest Hills, N.Y.: +1-718-261-2013, 14.4Kbps