A well-regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed. --Constitution of the United States of America, Amendment II, 1791 I'm not a consitiutional scholar, but it seems to me that since the government has already classed crypto as arms via ITAR and since the I am guaranteed the right to bear arms I choose to bear the crypto of my choice as part of my arsonal. The founding father's believed that the citizen's right to arms is all that may ultimately stand in the path of a government no longer duly constituted. In such a case a manditory GAK system could render all but the government's crypto impotent, disarming the populace of this valuable weapon. I therefore propose that since only strong crypto may be secure against the government in such a circumstances the government may not deny me the right to keep and bear the strong crypto of my choosing, unless I use it for criminal purpose. Futher in order that citizen militias employing strong crypto be well regulated (e.g., well maintained) the practice of using strong crypto by such citizens must be regular and wide spread. -- Steve PGP Fingerprint: FE 90 1A 95 9D EA 8D 61 81 2E CC A9 A4 4A FB A9 --------------------------------------------------------------------- Snoop Daty Data | Internet: azur@netcom.com Grinder | Voice: 1-702-655-2877 Sacred Cow Meat Co. | Fax: 1-702-658-2673 7075 W. Gowan Road, #2148 | Las Vegas, NV 89129 | --------------------------------------------------------------------- Just say NO to prescription DRUGS. "Of all tyrannies, a tyranny sincerely exercised for the good of its victims may be the most oppressive." -- C.S. Lewis "Surveillence is ultimately just another form of media, and thus, potential entertainment." -- G. Beato