14 Jun
2001
14 Jun
'01
12:06 p.m.
On Wed, 13 Jun 2001, John Young wrote:
Let me try again after reading Time's Q&A and the responding attorney claiming that anything inside a home is protected but nothing outside it is.
Well, this is pretty much pure bullshit. The LE folks are hip to using ir imaging to figure out who is running a whole lotta lights inside at night to determine who is doing home cultivation. They use this technique as probable cause to request a (rubber stamped) search warrant. Not the other way around. This type of surveillence is allowed without warrent because it is non-invasive.