There are accusations from Russia and France that PGP International and Network Associates are improperly and probably illegally refusing downloads of PGP to legitimate users. http://jya.com/pgpi-x-ru.htm http://jya.com/nai-x-fr.htm Phil Zimmermann and the companies have been asked by the plaintiffs to explain why public affirmations of open access are contradicted by illegal restrictions. Could this be due to pressure from US agencies or legal counsel to comply with covert directives of the nations to restrict access or pay the price of being denied markets? Maybe this is the way the Stewart Baker policy of encryption duplicity is being spread from NSA to the marketeers: Public assurances of concern and covert arrangements with authority to assure perpetuation of national security lockdown.