17 Dec
2003
17 Dec
'03
6:17 p.m.
On Tue, 15 Jul 1997, Kent Crispin wrote:
I wouldn't. Its the state's duty to protect my liberties and if they can't or won't the obligation falls on me. The product of liberty and security is a constant. This is obviously false. Zero liberty and zero security is a quite
On Tue, Jul 15, 1997 at 05:43:59PM -0700, Steve Schear wrote: [.deleted.] possible situation (laying strapped to the table, waiting for your lethal injection, for example), as is some liberty and some security (the normal situation).
I would say that in the above situation, one is rather well secured... Petro, Christopher C. petro@suba.com <prefered for any non-list stuff> snow@smoke.suba.com