-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- In <Version.32.19980601122218.00fbc410@pop.pipeline.com>, on 06/01/98 at 12:23 PM, John Young <jya@pipeline.com> said:
Thanks to GM
<sig> when will people learn? Microsoft is *incapable* and *unwilling* to provide even nominal security for it's platforms. Several problems that exist: Technical Ability -- Microsoft is seriously lacking in the technical know-how when it comes to cryptology and data security. Corporate Mentality -- Microsoft does not have the mentality needed to produce secure products. This is a company that has historically shipped poorly designed, bug filled products out the door. Bugs are not seen as a problem but as an opportunity to sell upgrades. While this has done them well in selling their overpriced GameBoys (the sheeple never cease to disappoint me) it is *not* the environment for developing secure products. Previous security foobars by M$: NT C2 <---- LOL!!! Active X <---- Who was the brain child that though *that* up? Auto-Launch attached binaries in E-Mail <-- Can we say GoodTimes? Crypto-API <--- Right I would *trust* that. Honest. :) TCP/IP Stack <--- Too many flaws to list. Why would anyone trust these simpletons to produce any type of security product? - -- - --------------------------------------------------------------- William H. Geiger III http://users.invweb.net/~whgiii Geiger Consulting Cooking With Warp 4.0 Author of E-Secure - PGP Front End for MR/2 Ice PGP & MR/2 the only way for secure e-mail. OS/2 PGP 5.0 at: http://users.invweb.net/~whgiii/pgp.html - --------------------------------------------------------------- Tag-O-Matic: I love running Windows! NOT! -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: 2.6.3a-sha1 Charset: cp850 Comment: Registered_User_E-Secure_v1.1b1_ES000000 iQCVAwUBNXMgd49Co1n+aLhhAQHmjAQArwgJj4kG8O+MYYCag4Xc8vr4zK4XDdGX niqu8nzfsJPfA2TisyFFyuFv9gejXQ6QhO7+tT2KQbbWJllPBIqIjjIqH8XkhcEW XhtMV/CoWprOp3tAHZi/n2LLn1kqtdhWG4FewGHn6R0Tzy6vq74ygk+qo9BeZNAd F92bia6qGio= =Cvy6 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----