I respectfully disagree. I spend most of my time going through sites like cnn.com, hotwired.com, news.com, altavista.digital.com, yahoo.com, lycos.com, hotbot.com, eff.org, well.com, mit.edu, whitehouse.gov, and so on. Search engines and directories, in particular, are good chokepoints to block. Blocking 100 sites would certainly be significant to me -- as long as they're the right ones. Before the technical fixes, that is. -Declan Duncan writes:
You must admit that a ban on 100 sites out of all the sites in the world is pretty insignificant. The swamping effects of thousands and soon millions of sites means the governments of the world won't even be able to evaluate a significant percentage even if they want to. And all this *before* we apply any of our technical fixes.
DCF