non-transferable signatures (Re: Crypto Kong penetration.) (fwd)

Forwarded message:

Date: Fri, 16 Jan 1998 15:30:05 GMT From: Adam Back Subject: non-transferable signatures (Re: Crypto Kong penetration.)

It might in fact be a dumb move to sign messages to the cypherpunks list -- proving that you wrote whatever, when for example the USG adds cypherpunks to it's growing list of terrorist organisations.

We're an 'organization'? Where is my monthly newsletter?....;) We should also pick our treasurer with some care. It is the prime target for law enforcement since it provides them access to the money records. In general I have to agree with Adam though, in the real world with ubiquitous and surreptitious monitoring signing documents is actualy a liability in many if not most cases. About the only exception is dealing with a contractual relationship. ____________________________________________________________________ | | | The most powerful passion in life is not love or hate, | | but the desire to edit somebody elses words. | | | | Sign in Ed Barsis' office | | | | _____ The Armadillo Group | | ,::////;::-. Austin, Tx. USA | | /:'///// ``::>/|/ http://www.ssz.com/ | | .', |||| `/( e\ | | -====~~mm-'`-```-mm --'- Jim Choate | | ravage@ssz.com | | 512-451-7087 | |____________________________________________________________________|