Re: GAK and self-incrimination?

Greg Broiles writes:

But it seems to me that the real bottom line is that the information which is compelled is not incriminating, and the information which is incriminating is not compelled. The keys to my crypto might lead to incriminating evidence, or they might prove to be useful in a prosecution, but they're not in themselves any sort of a signal that a crime has been or will be committed.

Written half in jest: Well, the cries from the TLAs of "Why do you want to use cryptography ? What do you have to hide ?" notwithstanding.... -Futplex <futplex@pseudonym.com>