I did come across some ill-informed post (not by Phillip though :-))
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 At 05:07 PM 12/7/97 +0800, Harish Pillay wrote: that
said that there are national filters to Internet access here. Well, indeed, the top level ISPs here have choosen to use filtering proxy servers to filter ^^^^^^^^ out an alleged list of 100 porno sites (you can see that there is an on going URL hunt to discover these filtered sites on www.sintercom.org/hunt/rahunt.html.
And if any of those ISP's "chose" not to engage in such filtering, how long would they be permitted to stay in business? -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: PGP for Personal Privacy 5.0 Charset: noconv iQA/AwUBNIr7wjKf8mIpTvjWEQLwWgCgx10JTQ0HL3oHqnbOtgSNqkGmhbIAoLiw yQW0aSbt7jFdSa4a5exAobyW =JC1J -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----