on 20 Sep 1998 at 09:52:24 Reeza! wrote:
At 09:21 PM 9/19/98 -0000, Anonymous wrote:
What? To tell a lie is one thing, but ...[etc]
It was prefaced with "...to tell the truth, the whole truth, and nothing but the truth...". Straighten out your head, you seem to be a few neurons short of a functional synapse.
Reeza!
I understand you think this is persuasive, but I don't understand why. and then at Sun, 20 Sep 1998 15:26:05 Reeza! wrote:
At 03:24 AM 9/20/98 -0000, Anonymous wrote:
I agree it's bad. I agree it undermines the justice system a little bit. But, ... impeachment?
I could care less if he had an affair, personally. But he had an affair with a subordinate in his direct employ. [more]
I congratulate you for your defense of a person who demonstrably has broken his marriage vows, his oath of public office, and purjured himself while under an additional oath in a court of law.
You do remember from 6 hours earlier that we're talking about lieing? Your raising other issues is irrelevant. You're building up the bogey man. [Jim Choate recently described this method as a "Strawman".] I suggested there are things Bill's done that are worse. Are you sure you're disagreeing? Do you have anything worthwhile to bring to the discussion?
You, too, are a few neurons short of a functional synapse.
I suggest you discuss it with the maker. The best way is large caliber bullet at sufficient velocity to penetrate and exit the cranial cavity.
God speed, you fucking idiot.
I guess not.
Reeza!
-- an anonymous aol32 user.