[It is probably a waste of time, but I'll try it anyway...] On Mon, 3 Nov 1997, bureau42 Anonymous Remailer wrote:
Let me guess, Lucky, you're using Windows, right? If I was a Windows user exclusively I probably wouldn't give a damn either.
Windows 95/NT, MacOS, FreeBSD, Linux, Solaris, AIX, and right now I need to deal with OS/390. 'Nuff said on the OS flame...
PGP Inc. has taken a *multi-platform* *network-wide* system and broken it. They released a Windows version months ago completely severing lines of communication between 5.0 and 2.x users.
Finally, after months, they get around to releasing a UNIX version so that everybody else can use PGP 5.x.
I probably should find it amusing to read such nonsene by people that don't know what they are talking about, but frankly, I just find it annoying. PGP released their UNIX code the same day they released their Windows code. I know. I was there. I have 7 volume of source on my shelf to prove it. Hurt my back lifting several boxes for re-distribution... That it took so long before the source was available was due to the US export laws. [The Windows and Mac source still isn't 100% proofread]. BTW, how many pages did *you* proofread? Thought so. I organized a 30 man tent full of proofreaders to get get stacks of pages full of assembler proofread. By the end of the weekend, the source was up for ftp. Your contribution to the project was...? 'Nuff said on this topic.
Of course the damned thing *still* isn't stable,
You have/are going to contribute how many man months of highly qualified programmer time to make PGP 5 fully stable? ... Right...I see.
*still* has a timebomb in it,
https://www.cypherpunks.to/pgp5hacks/ [For the braindead...]
and *still* has the command line broken.
Compatibility mode is not yet implemented. Are you voluntering your time?... Oh.... Hmm.. Anyway, I got to go and get some work done. Been nice talking with you. -- Lucky Green <shamrock@cypherpunks.to> PGP v5 encrypted email preferred. "Tonga? Where the hell is Tonga? They have Cypherpunks there?"