29 Nov
2000
29 Nov
'00
6:07 p.m.
At 05:12 PM 11/29/00 -0500, sunder wrote:
Jim, rather than sending this 63K email with a copyright violation, why don't you just send us the above URL with NO attachments?
It's not like you haven't been asked before. It's not like you can claim, "Oh, I didn't know." It's not like most of us can't access web pages.
There is something to be gained by duplicating what could be ephemeral content, e.g., for archives. As I download this drek at 28.8K I *do* support any call for serious editing, on general principles of signal vs. noise. 63K of *relevant* copy isn't too onerous, but should not be abused. My $.02