Re: Still more on the Digicash protocol

From: futplex@pseudonym.com (Futplex) It seems to me that end-to-end encryption is not significantly more important for remailed messages. Really, there's less information in the message when it emerges from the last remailer, so there's less to protect than in the ordinary case. Furthermore, it may not even be feasible, since I may not have a public key I can associate with my correspondent. ------------------------------------------ A possible solution: the correspondent generates a new public key and sends it as part of the transaction. The key is then wiped afterward. Sorry if this isn't possible due to something that I've misunderstood. -Allen