17 Dec
2003
17 Dec
'03
11:17 p.m.
To this the counter argument would run along the lines of:
"Exactly WHAT encryption algorithms, here, are not known and used, worldwide."
Is this close to the mark? What holes are there in this case (other than the fact that THEY get to make the laws)?
Given that they already allowed the exact same information to be exported in print form, there is the question of whether it is constitutional to discriminate on the basis of the medium of expression. In other words, this case comes pretty close to what groups like EFF were originally created to protect. Phil