On 27 Feb 2001, LUIS VILDOSOLA wrote:
Your last paragraph is a little too complicated for me Jim, I'm interested in what you have to say but please break it down for me.
Somebody does something. As a consequence another party is considered to have contributed to the first persons act, without actually participating in the act. So, if the first person is not fully responsible, why is the second party fully responsible? How do you test this? If a party whose actions contribute is responsible for the consequences then isn't the censor themselves, since they take an active role, also responsible? Doesn't this put a party in the defence in the role of presecutor and judge? That seems to be a considerable conflict of interest. ____________________________________________________________________ Before a larger group can see the virtue of an idea, a smaller group must first understand it. "Stranger Suns" George Zebrowski The Armadillo Group ,::////;::-. James Choate Austin, Tx /:'///// ``::>/|/ ravage@ssz.com www.ssz.com .', |||| `/( e\ 512-451-7087 -====~~mm-'`-```-mm --'- --------------------------------------------------------------------