![](https://secure.gravatar.com/avatar/dac2c7234cb5c7a58be01eeb2c8fda77.jpg?s=120&d=mm&r=g)
"William H. Geiger III" <whgiii@amaranth.com> writes:
It is obvious that some of the more intuitively intelligent list members are aware of this, as is indicated by the nervous fear with which they 'explain why' their post is crypto-relevant.
IMHO this is sheepish though I have noticed it before moderation started.
If I have somthing to post to the list I see no reason to justify why I am posting it. This post I am making now has zero crypto-relevance and I make no appoligies for it. Do I think it is relevant to the list? Yes otherwise I would not have posted it. Either way no explination for the post is needed.
Sandy is irrelevant. Why should we care if he tosses an article to cyphepunks-flames or to the censored list? Just subscribe to cypherpunks-unedited and ignore Sandy. If Gilmore persists in his disgraceful behavior, create an unmoderated list elsewhere. I think a lot of intelligent people have been wasting too much time and energy analyzing the behavior of a twit who simply doesn't deserve the attention his moderation effort has been getting. --- Dr.Dimitri Vulis KOTM Brighton Beach Boardwalk BBS, Forest Hills, N.Y.: +1-718-261-2013, 14.4Kbps