On Sun, 5 Nov 1995, Anonymous wrote:
Notice that both messages went through an unnamed site -- 134.222.9.1 and then a strangely-named site, "lp (134.222.35.2)" -- then through the same Vienna, Virginia (USA) site ... and thereafter, on to their destination. I.e., the second message went through Virginia to get from Switzerland to Israel.
The whois servers at the InterNIC and at nic.ddn.mil for MILNET Information report, ``No match for "134.222.9.1". '' and `` No match for "134.222.35.2".''
Yes, you've finally cottoned on to the secret NSA routing trick to cleverly tap all traffic. Really clever the way they use two hosts in the 132.222 Class B network. Strange that traffic from EUNET should be using that network, especially since it happens to be listed in the whois database as being NET-EUNET-X25. ::chivalry:ses$ whois -h rs.internic.net 134.222 ::European Unix Users Group (NET-EUNET-X25) :: Kruislaan 413 :: NL-1098 SJ Amsterdam :: NETHERLANDS