The last thing that really, really bugs me is the hostility that's directed towards PGP Inc. because now we're an Inc.
There is no hostility towards PGP, Inc. It is just that many people think your software contains a feature which has very bad consequences. Incidentally, I heard a speech by Phil Zimmermann the day before PGP 5.5 was released. He expressed deep concerns about key escrow, epxressly including PGP products. Think about it. Personally, I think a corporation has the right to access their employees' business communications, so as long as private messages remain private, there CAK is no big problem (not that it is exactly useful, either). However, when you claim that you are reacting to to non-existant public safety concerns, I wonder what the real agenda is. It is also surprising that you fail to recognize the difference between communications keys and storage keys.