At 11:13 PM -0500 11/26/06, Ulex "Europae" (s/b Ulex europaeus, a small highland shrub; maybe it's trying to speak in the royal 'we', but more likely Yet Another EuroLefty, apparently of the Scottish* variety) wrote:
You aren't really advancing a might-makes-right argument are you?
Might makes *fact*. "Right" is a fact made palatable by rationalization. When facts change, ethics change. If you don't believe that, you haven't read enough history yet. Physics causes finance, which causes philosophy; ethics in this particular case.
penurious antipathy
Blah, blah, blah. Go back under your bridge, troll. Or at least masturbate about your "rights" on a list where people give a damn. Again, for the groundlings, at least, since shrubbery doesn't have ears: When the market needs ubiquitous easy-to-use encryption it'll get it. When that's the case nothing the state can do will "repress" it. And, when somebody writes code worthy of being ubiquitous and easy-to-use, there's nothing the market will be able do to "repress" it, either. And somebody will get rich writing it, because the market will pay for it. So, take your shot, um, Mr. Shrub, and *write* the code you want. Until then, stop bleating around here about your "rights", and how other people should do your work for you for free. Cheers, RAH *<http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gorse> -- ----------------- R. A. Hettinga <mailto: rah@ibuc.com> The Internet Bearer Underwriting Corporation <http://www.ibuc.com/> 44 Farquhar Street, Boston, MA 02131 USA "... however it may deserve respect for its usefulness and antiquity, [predicting the end of the world] has not been found agreeable to experience." -- Edward Gibbon, 'Decline and Fall of the Roman Empire'