Since you're convinced that your system can stand scrutiny, why not post a URL for a paper describing the algorithims, key management, etc, of your system. What you've posted here is unparseable, with the exception of some nonsense, which parses to `We know enough to be dangerous.' Adam IPG Sales wrote: | >From that 5600 bits, a combination of a prime number numbers, picked from | a large random table, by 512 of the random bits, ie 64 large prime | numbers, and the other random bits are used to generate the random numbers | used. This in effect creates a humoungous cycled encryption wheel | system, with over 10 to the 2300th power possibilities before repeats, | similar to engima but more like the most secured electronic encryption | systems used prior to the advent of computers. | <sigh> - Einstein - He who thinks that he knows everything, knows | nothing. | -- "It is seldom that liberty of any kind is lost all at once." -Hume