--
At 08:46 PM 7/21/01 -0500, measl@mfn.org wrote:
On Sat, 21 Jul 2001, David Honig wrote:
All this argues for anonymously coded projects, etc. But that means you can't get credit for novel research. This is one of the ways that the DCMA is counter to historically unimpeded research & innovation ---Its not rational for profs sans tenure to work without credit.
Publish or perish,
While it is of little real-world usefulness, it should be noted that such annonymous publication can retain credit towards an individual author by being published under a publicly published yet anonymous public key.
On 21 Jul 2001, at 19:09, David Honig wrote:
That doesn't work when you tell your department that you are the author associated with some (formerly) anonymous key.
Yes, it does work in the world of building reputations associated with (anonymous or claimed-not-anonymous) keys, but not when you need meatspace credit --give the meat named "Prof Joe" tenure credit for work X.
It is common for real world authors to publish under nom de plumes. Adding a key to a nom de plume gives added advantages to the nom de plume. --digsig James A. Donald 6YeGpsZR+nOTh/cGwvITnSR3TdzclVpR0+pr3YYQdkG Eu8MhbQzxLzawwupANxUSdkz5ajpgUlCWGAmgHC6 4z2F9XsFvwx0oHd5o/xto/496sZij2Desy+NOTo42