9 Jan
2001
9 Jan
'01
11:41 a.m.
On Tue, 9 Jan 2001, Trei, Peter wrote:
[Jim: It's ok that you have no problem with your ineffective methods of giving pointers to articles, but your wasting your own and other's time - there's simply no reason for people to follow your links, since they are generally useless]
Actually, not *entirely* useless. Usually right after jim talks about an article and posts a link that doesn't point at it, someone else will post a correct link. If Jim just shut up, some of these stories probably would escape our notice. In the course of correcting his errors, people do provide useful information. Bear