17 Dec
2003
17 Dec
'03
6:17 p.m.
At 03:05 PM 7/12/96 -0400, Will Rodger wrote:
As I see it, the most important issue is not the legal status of the one actually doing the export/mailing, but in fact the organization which is the recipient and thus, the beneficiary of this act. _THAT_ organization will be well-identified, yet will not have done anything obviously illegal. Is there any indication that Baker was trying to distinguish between the one physically mailing it, and those receiving it?
Yup. He was speaking only of the US company.
Any indication about what the USG might be able to do, SPECIFICALLY, legally or in retaliation? Jim Bell jimbell@pacifier.com